Tag: sme

Media and finance industry need to work together to show that P2P comes in more than one flavour

Author
Angus Dent
Date

Once again, we find mainstream media treating the diverse alternative finance sector as one homogenous group and misleading or alarming investors in the process.

This time, we have Ruth Lythe of the Daily Mail launching with a headline on 7 June, “MPs attack risky online firms offering 7% returns from lending savers’ cash to strangers to buy cars and even phones”.

The article refers to Zopa’s recent announcement of its point-of-sale partnership with Unshackled.com.

In essence, the article can be summarised in one of the lines within it: ‘P2P loans are risky’.  This is written without providing any context for the reader, which is both naïve and does a great disservice to existing and potential investors.

  • A comment on the losses experienced to date by peer-to-peer investors would have been good (they are below what the banks accept as ‘normal’ and are published by the largest platforms in the smallest detail for all to see, which is something the banks never do).
  • A comment on the variety of models available in P2P would have been helpful too, rather than bracket everything under one, doom-laden label.

Of course a judgement has to be made when investing in peer-to-peer. Judgement is required in most forms of investment, but what really matters and needs explaining when making sweeping assessments of this nature is how the likelihood of loss is mitigated and managed, which differs from platform to platform.

In the case of Archover, all business loans have to pass the scrutiny of not only our own lending specialists, but also those of leading credit insurers, who provide cover on the underlying asset that we use as security. If we were even tempted to lower our standards we would not be allowed to do so. I know of no bank that can provide that same level of comfort.

Daily Mail Old

In other parts of the market, RateSetter and others have provision funds which cover all losses. This means that, to date, nobody has ever lost money lending over their platforms. The banks rely on the good old UK tax payer for such a guarantee.

I think I speak for the entire industry here when I say the FCA is doing an excellent job in making sure investors are as informed as possible about the nature of their investments.

Andrew Tyrie’s letter to the FCA on behalf of the Treasury Select Committee is perfectly reasonable and I have no doubt the Regulator will provide a full and well considered response in good time. This will no doubt include some of the facts, such as net returns for investors after default being in the range of 5%-7% since the inception of the industry, the never before seen level of transparency in financial services and the resilience of the sector to economic shocks – even against the most stringent scenario laid out by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).

The Regulator will certainly have our full backing if even more improvements can be made to help investors.

As an industry, we do not criticise the Daily Mail or the media at large for advising caution, but we do implore it to examine the facts and make a more rounded assessment on behalf of its readers.

Are Commerzbank about to blaze the P2P Lending trail?

Author
Angus Dent
Date

In the Twittersphere, the word “Fintech” tends to provoke a lot of hot air. Speculation leads to everything from wild estimations and massive valuations to doomsday predictions and floccinaucinihilipilification. You aren’t going to get that word into 140 characters easily, but the exaggerated fervorous lexicon endemic to “#FinTech” dictates that you should try to if you want to fit in. And it isn’t just Twitter; print media and digital news services regularly produce supercharged opinion articles that try so hard to “think the unthinkable” that the “thinkable” (and usually the reasonable) is of seemingly negligible importance. As I’ve said before, that is what happens when you create a portmanteau that attempts to define such far-reaching businesses and sectors. Readers will start to think that Bitcoin price fluctuations become, all of a sudden, of tantamount importance to a Peer to Peer lending platform.

In light of this, Crowdfund Insider’s headline “Germany’s Second Largest Bank, Commerzbank, said to Launch P2P Platform this Year” seems to suggest a familiar speculatory path is being trodden, particularly as it comes from “informed sources” whispering in the ear of the P2P-Banking.com blog. The article claims that German behemoth Commerzbank plans to launch its own P2P Lending marketplace, “Main Funders”, in 2016. Yet what is particularly interesting here is that this would be the first sign of a bank directly implementing an in-house peer-to-peer lending operation. Why is this interesting? Because it makes a lot of sense, and it could herald a huge change in the way people see peer to peer lending. Plenty of banks, both big and small, are showing an increased appetite for lending across platforms in both the UK, US and Europe. Under German law, only banks can fund loans; to bypass this all existing P2P lending companies in Germany partner with a transaction bank which originates the loan and then sells the proceeds (repayments and interest) to the investors: a complex procedure that is hardly widespread. By building its own platform, Commerzbank would circumvent some of the legal hurdles and provide the tailored, modern and agile solution to SME borrowing that the banks in the UK can’t (or won’t) provide, whilst also offering investors and savers an increase on the miserable rates they are all too used to.

Commerzbank has Main Incubator as their fintech accelerator offering venture capital to start ups, so it is an area that they should know well and more importantly have a vested interest in. This may sound like bad news for smaller peer to peer lending platforms who may fear being muscled out. However, it is more likely a case of “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”: established banks bring the wealth, history and stature that could help Peer to Peer Lending escape from the bubble of hot air that is “Fintech”. However, is this really P2P lending? We have a bank, a highly regulated entity, entering a market that isn’t so highly regulated, certainly in terms of capital requirements. One of the things that has driven the banks away from SME lending is the large amounts of capital they have to put aside for these loans. This is behind the drive towards Invoice Discounting, which requires less capital to be put aside. Commerzbank’s solution could be that their P2P requires less capital than ordinary SME lending. There’s also the question as to whether Commerzbank, and other German banks, have made sufficient provision for the bad lending of the past. Is this a case of smoke and mirrors in the form of moving things around the balance sheet?

What is certain is that banks’ enthusiasm for P2P lending would produce solid, mutually beneficial relationships that can help SMEs and savers alike. Yes, there will inevitably be teething problems as the banks adapt to the fleet-footed world of P2P lending and the P2P lenders adapt their models to fit the strict regulatory processes of the banks. But Commerzbank’s embryonic P2P marketplace could be the trailblazer that sets the way for future banking… if it exists at all.

ArchOver’s ‘secured and insured’ proposition represents industry best practice

Author
Alex Taylor
Date

A study produced by independent research house Equity Development has concluded that ArchOver’s ‘secured and insured’ business model represents best practice in the P2P crowdlending sector and “perhaps even represents the future of corporate lending to SMEs worldwide.”

 

Commenting on the safety of the sector as a whole, analyst Paul Hill says that “credit vetting procedures are at least on par with the high street banks” and predicts that “going forward, across the economic cycle, a diversified portfolio of P2P loans should be able to generate ‘relatively predictable’ returns of circa 5% per annum (net of costs and defaults).”

 

Mr Hill also rejects Lord Adair Turner’s recently expressed negative outlook for the P2P sector, predicting instead that “We still think it is possible for risk tolerant investors to generate healthy returns from holding a basket of non-correlated, fixed income P2P loans in today’s low interest rate environment.”

 

The report records that ArchOver has arranged 81 loans collectively worth £15.2m without so far incurring any late payments. It places ArchOver’s loan portfolio in the band between S&P’s lower investment grade (BBB) and upper high yield (BB-) ratings.

 

The study concludes that “The P2P sector appears to have an attractive future ahead of it, involving plenty of years (if not decades) of strong growth. ArchOver’s unique ‘secured and insured’ proposition represents industry best practice and, in our opinion, is a powerful differentiator to attract lenders and creditworthy borrowers alike.”

 

Responding to Equity Development’s findings, ArchOver’s CEO Angus Dent said: “It’s always gratifying when an independent source says positive things not just about your organisation, but also about the sector in which it operates. There are a lot of players in the P2P sector and, in the fullness of time, we will all have to face more difficult times which will result in casualties and some inevitable industry consolidation. However, in the meantime, creditworthy SMEs are gaining access to the funding they require and lenders are earning a decent return on their money.”

 

Why Late Payments are an SME’s worst nightmare

Author
Angus Dent
Date

The Market Invoice presentation on late payment brought back into focus the traditional scourge of the SME. Whilst I think that invoice finance and factoring are definitely not the way to finance a business struggling with late payment, the presentation certainly made interesting viewing.

I thought I would add a few points to prove just how damaging late payment can be for SMEs, but first it is worth stressing that a term loan from an alternative finance provider with a light touch approach is the best solution for an SME suffering with late payment from their debtors. A term loan through an alternative finance provider can help SMEs facilitate finance quickly, without hassle and with tailored solutions. The banks’ turnaround time often takes one year plus; through AltFi borrowers can receive the funds within a couple of months. As the banks increasingly funnel more business to AltFi providers, the industry is slowly gaining the respect it deserves. However, this should not extend to invoice financing. It is the crack cocaine of finance, incredibly difficult to shirk and once the cycle is entrenched an SME will find it very hard to escape from.

Back to late payment…

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were owed £26.8bn as of July according to Bacs. In attempting to recover this debt, these businesses are spending £10.8bn a year. This downward spiral causes many SMEs to go into panic mode, fuelled by the fear of losing reputation and offending customers when chasing payment. And as approximately 99% of businesses nationwide fall into the category of SMEs, this is a major drag on the economy.

According to a Zurich poll one in five SMEs reported that they are owed more than £25,000, one in 10 more than £100,00 and more than 43,000 SMEs are owed more than £1 million. The affect for an SME? Expansion in terms of cash flow and hiring staff is inhibited and most importantly up to 130 hours of valuable time is wasted per year chasing invoices which could be used effectively elsewhere.

Existing legislation is supposed to provide SMEs with assistance; late payments can be recouped according to the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Act (1998). From an outside perspective this may seem like the answer to an SME’s problems; however 58% of SMEs say that they will not claim compensation for any late payment even though they are legally entitled to this. Once again the fears of the losing business and ruining relationships far outweigh the immediate compensation in terms of cash. The solution? Everybody pay on time – fat chance. The tonic to sooth the pain can come in the form of alternative finance providers such as peer-to-peer lenders who understand the needs of SMEs and can provide practical solutions to real problems.