ARCHOVER LAUNCHES LENDER REFERRAL SCHEME

London, UK – 5 June 2017 – ArchOver, is pleased to announce the launch of the ArchOver Lender Referral Scheme. The programme is aimed at rewarding all existing Lenders who invite a friend(s), who then goes on to pledge £5,000 within 90 days.
At ArchOver, we know that our Lender community is a critical factor in everything we have done and continue to do. We would like to thank our existing Lender network and ask them to spread the word about ArchOver through our Lender Referral Scheme.
Lenders can now invite friends and family to sign-up and pledge to ArchOver projects and in return earn cash directly to their bank account. For each new investor they refer that goes on to pledge £5,000 or more within 90 days, we will give them both £75!
Every Lender who registers with ArchOver receives a unique referral code by email. This code can also be found when you log in to the Lender Dashboard under ‘Invite & Earn’.

There is no limit to the number of people a Lender can refer. The Lender will earn £75 for every successful referral that fulfils the terms and conditions of the ArchOver Lender Referral Scheme.

Full Terms and Conditions of the Referral Scheme can be found here. If you have any further questions, please get in touch on 0203 021 8100 or at support@archover.com.

ARCHOVER GRANTED FULL FCA AUTHORISATION

London, UK – 24 May 2017 – ArchOver, the peer-to-peer (P2P) business lending platform, has secured full authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to operate as a P2P lending platform (Article 36H). Since launching in September 2014, ArchOver has facilitated over £35 million of investment over its platform, operating under interim permissions granted by the FCA. Full authorisation will support ArchOver in attracting new lenders to the platform and allow it to continue working with businesses to make access to funding as easy and simple as possible.

“There is great satisfaction in gaining a stamp of approval. Our industry leading policies and procedures will allow us to take alternative forms of lending to the next level,” commented Angus Dent, CEO at ArchOver. “At a time when investors are experiencing low interest rates and banks are tightening the purse-strings, P2P lending offers a unique and much needed service. Incorporating the most successful elements of P2P lending into the regulations and strategy of the FCA is critical to raising awareness and protecting the long-term success of the industry.”

As a fully authorised P2P lending platform, ArchOver can operate on a level regulatory playing field and focus on expanding its community of investors to achieve its ambition of facilitating £500 million of lending within the next five years. With no borrower defaults, late payments or losses in nearly three years of operations, ArchOver delivers an above-industry-average return of 7.24% to investors.

Backed by the Hampden Group, ArchOver has developed two asset-based lending services allowing UK SME’s to borrow against Accounts Receivable and/or recurring contracted revenue. Its experienced management and credit team carefully vet borrowers and monitor the performance of businesses and assets every month. ArchOver also partners with Coface, the world-leading provider of credit insurance and debt recovery services, to offer additional security.

“From the first day of operations, we’ve placed lender security at the heart of our business model to exceed any potential compliance requirements,” commented Ian Anderson, Chief Operating Officer at ArchOver, who has been closely involved in the authorisation process with the FCA. “This attitude meant we have not had to change our primary working practices in order to comply with regulation. While we have waited a long time to gain this recognition, we always believed that it was in the best interests of ArchOver, and the sector in general, that the FCA take the necessary time to ensure the process was thorough and fair.”

Jargon Busting

The varied funding structures used by new companies can be a bewildering topic for the uninitiated, not least because they are mired in financial jargon.

 

How many non-financial people could explain how seed funding differs from mezzanine finance for example? Or who supplies these different types of funding?

 

Let’s cut through the jargon and take a look at the key concepts.

 

When any company is created, or in its early stages, it is described as a startup. They are often not profitable or even generating revenue.

 

jargon-busting

 

Thus, they desperately require a financial lifeline to help navigate through this formative period. This seed capital, as it is known, is usually equity rather than debt and allows startups to invest in areas such as product development and general operations to get them on their feet.

 

So where do they look to obtain it? It is hard to come by from traditional financers such as banks, or venture capitalists, as it considered a very high risk investment, so startup directors must often look to friends, family and their own savings for this initial cash. It is also likely that some angel investors (like TV’s dragons) will be interested in investing at this very early stage. These are often wealthy veteran entrepreneurs who invest their own money and can offer advice based on experiences.

 

Latterly, of course, crowdfunding platforms have also offered equity-based funding.

 

If the startup moves forward, the business may then be in a position to launch a new round of funding and attract new investment when the initial funding runs out. This is likely be referred to as a Series A funding round and may be followed by a Series B, C, D and so on. These are sometimes termed alphabet rounds.

 

These will usually be for an equity stake in the business, though some businesses may offer debt instead if their balance sheets are robust and directors do not want to dilute their ownership.

 

Unlike the initial round, however, the business will now likely be able to attract institutional investment from venture capitalists to stabilise them over the medium-term.

 

Venture capitalists invest through a business, rather than as individuals or part of a syndicate as angel investors do, and also tend to offer larger amounts than angels. They will likewise offer a growing business support and contacts to help them, but will generally take a more active role in its running and require a seat on the board.

 

All these companies will now have traded for at least a few years, acquiring a financial track record and hopefully a steady customer base. This increased business maturity and stability tends to translate into lower risk (and lower reward) for potential investors, something that changes the nature of the available sources of finance.

 

Some companies with more robust balance sheets will now be in a position to seek out senior debt in the form of loans secured against assets of the business.

 

Senior debtholders are those that are most likely to be repaid in the event that a business gets into financial difficulty. Gaining a loan from a bank at this this stage of development is notoriously difficult however. As such, businesses are increasingly turning to newer sources of finance, such as peer-to-peer lending platforms, to provide them with the credit lines they need.

 

Others businesses that lack assets against which to secure debt, or the stable cash flows to service it, may look to invoice financing to improve their cash flow.

 

Invoice financing can be split into discounting and factoring, both of which involve the third party finance provider advancing the money owed to a business by its customers, minus a service fee. With factoring, the finance provider takes control of the debtor book, while with discounting the relationship between a business and its customers is left untouched.

 

For businesses in certain sectors, manufacturing particularly, there is an increasing availability of supply chain finance (SCF). SCF links buyer, seller and financier, providing short-term credit to optimise working capital for both buyer and seller. More simply put the buyer uses the financiers money to pay the suppliers invoices, with the financier taking title to the raw materials provided and the goods that the buyers manufactures from them. SCF is available from both banks and P2P business lenders.

 

For those businesses that seek to expand aggressively though, either of these forms of financing alone may not be enough, leading them to seek out mezzanine finance to help them achieve their goals.

 

Mezzanine finance is usually unsecured and sits behind senior debt in terms of repayment priority. Because of this increased risk for the lender, it carries a much higher interest rate and often a clause that converts the debt into equity in the company if the loan is not repaid.

 

These types of funding will suffice to meet the business requirements of many companies, allowing for growth while keeping ownership in private hands. The next step, if the company chooses, is to go public with an IPO (Initial Public Offering).

 

There are a number of reasons why a company might consider going public, such as reducing the burden of interest payments or generating publicity. Over and above any of these considerations though is the ability that being publically listed brings to raise large amounts of capital on a consistent basis.

 

That said, firms must take into account the significant costs of the listing process, as well as the increased regulatory requirements.

 

 

Skin in the Game

The term ‘skin the game’ is a fairly recent addition to the P2P business lending sector’s collection of ‘cool’ phrases. An import from the equity finance side of the fence, it is meant to comfort lenders/investors with the thought that, if they lose their money, others – particularly the borrowers, but also other lenders – will lose theirs, too. But apart from sounding modern and slick, does it send a message that typical lenders necessarily want to hear? And does it have any real value anyway?

‘Skin in the game’ has crept into the picture because a few P2P lenders have taken the step of putting money from their own balance sheets into selected projects. The motive for taking this kind of risk appears to be to help certain borrowers raise the cash they need because (a) some loans do not meet the usual lending criteria and (b) in the platform’s estimation, the borrower company nevertheless deserves support. Their action bears all the hallmarks of bank lending, which is why some commentators are beginning to ask whether this is the first step towards achieving that ultimate ambition. It suggests that everyone in the P2P sector secretly wants to trade their original disrupter ticket in order to become a bank.

plant-money-grow

We can’t possibly comment on the corporate plans of our competitors, but ArchOver’s position on this is quite clear: we are not a bank and neither do we have any ambitions in that direction. We are not a venture capital company, either. We provide a matching service between borrowers and lenders, using a unique business model designed to protect the interests of all parties, but especially lenders.

Furthermore, it is our contention that having the right business model – in our case we use credit insurance to protect assets valued at 125% of the loan – offers far better lender protection than having a borrower prepared to risk their own money to the tune of, say, 5% of the total as a gesture towards the ‘skin in the game’ culture.

On the issue of fairness, surely it is far better to treat all lenders the same, irrespective of whether they are individuals, family office or small institutions; there should be no special deals for anyone. And we would also argue that it is better to conduct rigorous due diligence in the first place, and to stick to the criteria rather than try to justify special cases. We do not subscribe to the notion that borrowers and lenders want to see platforms putting their own solvency at risk through approving poor loans. That’s something the banks do!