The State of London’s Property Market

[avatar]

Every morning as I walk in to work, I pass the old Port of London Authority building that dominates the eastern side of Seething Lane. Sat derelict and covered up for months, this colossal building’s classical façade has finally been re-exposed as its renovation nears completion. And when it is finished next year, 41 newly furnished luxury apartments will come to market with prices as grandiose as the building itself: £5 million for a one bedroom flat. Perhaps it is not surprising that such peerlessly positioned homes are given these lofty valuations. But the prices they command are proving more and more commonplace in modern London. Indeed, few topics have held as many column inches in recent years as London property prices, and the statistics illustrate why this is the case.

Since 2010, the average asking price for a London home has risen 49% to £594,585 according to the online real estate firm Rightmove. To put this in a global context, Savills now estimates the value of London property to be greater than the GDP of Brazil. As a result, it is estimated that first time buyers now need a salary of £77,000 before buying a London home even becomes a possibility. All this is made more galling by the fact that the future trajectory of house prices appears resiliently steep; despite stalling somewhat since August 2014, prices are still predicted to rise by 10.4% over the next five years. Getting a foot onto the capital’s property ladder has never looked so unattainable.

Property market 1

So how has such a highly valued market come to fruition? One of the more frequently cited factors in the media is the significant inflow of foreign investment that London has experienced, particularly as a result of instability in Russia and the Middle East. With 70% of central London property going to foreign buyers in recent years, this is undeniably an important demand-side factor. But over and above this, the supply of houses has simply not increased at the necessary rate to keep prices flat.

Predictably, policies intended to alleviate this housing crisis in London and further afield have featured heavily in the election campaigns of both the Labour party and the Conservatives. The former have pledged to build 200,000 houses a year by 2020, the latter to extend Margaret Thatcher’s ‘right-to-buy’ scheme and introduce discounts for first time buyers. Fears have circulated that Miliband would seek to neuter other Conservative schemes aimed at helping first time buyers in this difficult market, though it is the left-wing party’s proposed ‘Mansion Tax’ that has stirred up particular ire for its potential effects on the property market.

Property market 2

The website Zoopla has argued that if this proposed levy on homes worth over £2 million were enforced, it would stymy demand from high net worth foreign investors whilst simultaneously increasing competition further down the property ladder. And whilst it is not surprising that a property website would dislike interference in the housing market, their arguments are partially reinforced by analysis which suggests that the entire high-end property market could be at a tipping point. Drawing on historical property data of periods of both Labour and Conservative governments, the report in The Telegraph estimates that luxury home sales could fall by 27% under a Labour government or jump by 20% under a Conservative one. The possible impact of a ‘Mansion Tax’ on the appetite of high end buyers is clear.

As the last few votes are counted this morning, it appears that a Conservative victory is now a certainty. Whether this is a victory for first time buyers will not become evident for some time. But the developers of the old Port of London Authority apartments will likely be breathing a sigh of relief.

 

The Minimum Wage – Part I

[avatar]

Ask any individual in Britain today for their opinion on the Blair administration and the Iraq War will undoubtedly be mentioned. Indeed, whilst twelve years have now passed since the controversial decision was taken to prosecute this war in the Middle East – on the pretext of seeking out so-called ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’ – the fallout is still being felt, with news of the atrocities being committed by the terrorist groups that have since filled the regional power vacuum keeping this decision under continual scrutiny. But to allow this conflict to colour New Labour’s entire tenure is unfair, as it obscures the fact that at least one of this government’s policies, the introduction of a National Minimum Wage, has been an unqualified success. In fact, as the point scoring between parties has escalated in the run up to this year’s general election, this issue has remained at the very forefront of political discourse.

The National Minimum Wage originally came into force in April 1999 and set the hourly wage floor for workers over the age of 22 at £3.60/hour, rising since to £6.50/hour. The scheme was developed to combat poverty by ensuring that a basic wage would be provided for all workers, an issue deemed particularly important in the face of the dwindling membership of trade unions. Labour enjoyed support from the Liberal Democrats on the issue but were opposed by the Conservatives who, following economic arguments propounded by Milton Friedman and others, feared that it would add to business costs and lead to job losses by distorting the labour market.

Minimum Wage image

Time has shown those opposing the scheme to have been misguided. A report from the Royal Economic Society credits the minimum wage with directly raising the wages of 5% of workers and indirectly raising the wages of another 25% due to a ‘spillover’ effect, noting further that the feared job losses failed to materialise. As such, they make a strong argument for viewing the introduction of the minimum wage as ‘one of the most successful market policies of recent times.’

Parties across the political spectrum have been receptive to this success, with Conservative opposition dissipating and no mainstream entities now looking to revoke the measure. That is not to say, however, that this year’s candidates’ approach to the minimum wage is uniform. The incumbent government has already pledged to increase the minimum wage to £6.70 in October of this year, but the Conservatives and UKIP are focused more keenly on removing low earners from tax than increasing the size of their paychecks. The left-leaning parties, on the other hand, would look to greatly increase the minimum over the coming years with Labour, the SNP and the Greens all targeting at least £8/hour by 2020. The likelihood of a coalition resulting from this year’s election muddies the waters of these pre-election promises, as compromise is inevitable. But with some mooting increases to the minimum wage far sharper than has ever been seen before, the debate moves to what effect this would have on businesses.